Export limit exceeded: 419554 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 419554 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (182 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1609 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 4 Keycloak-quarkus-server, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2026-07-16 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. When the JSON Web Token (JWT) authorization grant preview feature is enabled and a user account is disabled, Keycloak fails to validate the user’s disabled status during JWT authorization grant processing. A remote attacker with low privileges can exploit this improper access control vulnerability by presenting a valid assertion token from an external identity provider to obtain a JWT for a disabled user. This allows unauthorized access to sensitive resources. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12799 | 1 Redhat | 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-07-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Jastow. Jastow is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack. If using a set of combined configuration to allow unescaped characters in URL with embedded Undertow and Jastow, a server might be vulnerable to improper input handling. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11800 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 4 more | 2026-06-26 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. This JWT algorithm confusion vulnerability in the JWT Authorization Grant flow allows an attacker with valid client credentials to bypass signature verification. By forging an assertion, the attacker can create unauthorized access tokens. This enables the attacker to impersonate any federated user linked to the affected Identity Provider, leading to unauthorized access and potential privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4874 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-06-26 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated attacker can perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by manipulating the `client_session_host` parameter during refresh token requests. This occurs when a Keycloak client is configured to use the `backchannel.logout.url` with the `application.session.host` placeholder. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to make HTTP requests from the Keycloak server’s network context, potentially probing internal networks or internal APIs, leading to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4029 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-06-26 | 4.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Wildfly’s management interface. Due to the lack of limitation of sockets for the management interface, it may be possible to cause a denial of service hitting the nofile limit as there is no possibility to configure or set a maximum number of connections. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2251 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp | 2026-06-25 | 6.2 Medium |
| A security flaw exists in WildFly and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) within the Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) remote invocation mechanism. This vulnerability stems from untrusted data deserialization handled by JBoss Marshalling. This flaw allows an attacker to send a specially crafted serialized object, leading to remote code execution without requiring authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4366 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-06-09 | 5.8 Medium |
| A flaw was identified in Keycloak, an identity and access management solution, where it improperly follows HTTP redirects when processing certain client configuration requests. This behavior allows an attacker to trick the server into making unintended requests to internal or restricted resources. As a result, sensitive internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints could be accessed. This issue may lead to information disclosure and enable attackers to map internal network infrastructure. | ||||
| CVE-2012-4550 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp | 2026-05-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform. When role-based authorization is used for Enterprise Java Beans (EJB) access, the system does not correctly call the necessary authorization modules. This prevents Java Authorization Contract for Containers (JACC) permissions from being applied, allowing remote attackers to gain unauthorized access to EJBs. | ||||
| CVE-2012-4549 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp | 2026-05-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform. The `processInvocation` function within the `org.jboss.as.ejb3.security.AuthorizationInterceptor` component incorrectly authorizes all requests when no roles are defined for an Enterprise Java Beans (EJB) method invocation. This allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions for EJB methods, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive functionalities. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7784 | 1 Redhat | 5 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 2 more | 2026-05-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Keycloak identity and access management system when Fine-Grained Admin Permissions(FGAPv2) are enabled. An administrative user with the manage-users role can escalate their privileges to realm-admin due to improper privilege enforcement. This vulnerability allows unauthorized elevation of access rights, compromising the intended separation of administrative duties and posing a security risk to the realm. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1190 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-04-18 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak's SAML brokering functionality. When Keycloak is configured as a client in a Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) setup, it fails to validate the `NotOnOrAfter` timestamp within the `SubjectConfirmationData`. This allows an attacker to delay the expiration of SAML responses, potentially extending the time a response is considered valid and leading to unexpected session durations or resource consumption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2733 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-04-16 | 3.8 Low |
| A flaw was identified in the Docker v2 authentication endpoint of Keycloak, where tokens continue to be issued even after a Docker registry client has been administratively disabled. This means that turning the client “Enabled” setting to OFF does not fully prevent access. As a result, previously valid credentials can still be used to obtain authentication tokens. This weakens administrative controls and could allow unintended access to container registry resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0871 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-04-16 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An administrator with `manage-users` permission can bypass the "Only administrators can view" setting for unmanaged attributes, allowing them to modify these attributes. This improper access control can lead to unauthorized changes to user profiles, even when the system is configured to restrict such modifications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3009 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2026-04-16 | 8.1 High |
| A security flaw in the IdentityBrokerService.performLogin endpoint of Keycloak allows authentication to proceed using an Identity Provider (IdP) even after it has been disabled by an administrator. An attacker who knows the IdP alias can reuse a previously generated login request to bypass the administrative restriction. This undermines access control enforcement and may allow unauthorized authentication through a disabled external provider. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1035 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-04-16 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in the Keycloak server during refresh token processing, specifically in the TokenManager class responsible for enforcing refresh token reuse policies. When strict refresh token rotation is enabled, the validation and update of refresh token usage are not performed atomically. This allows concurrent refresh requests to bypass single-use enforcement and issue multiple access tokens from the same refresh token. As a result, Keycloak’s refresh token rotation hardening can be undermined. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3121 | 2 Keycloak, Redhat | 8 Keycloak, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An administrator with `manage-clients` permission can exploit a misconfiguration where this permission is equivalent to `manage-permissions`. This allows the administrator to escalate privileges and gain control over roles, users, or other administrative functions within the realm. This privilege escalation can occur when admin permissions are enabled at the realm level. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1180 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.8 Medium |
| A flaw was identified in Keycloak’s OpenID Connect Dynamic Client Registration feature when clients authenticate using private_key_jwt. The issue allows a client to specify an arbitrary jwks_uri, which Keycloak then retrieves without validating the destination. This enables attackers to coerce the Keycloak server into making HTTP requests to internal or restricted network resources. As a result, attackers can probe internal services and cloud metadata endpoints, creating an information disclosure and reconnaissance risk. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6717 | 1 Redhat | 15 Amq Broker, Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid and 12 more | 2026-04-15 | 6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the SAML client registration in Keycloak that could allow an administrator to register malicious JavaScript URIs as Assertion Consumer Service POST Binding URLs (ACS), posing a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) risk. This issue may allow a malicious admin in one realm or a client with registration access to target users in different realms or applications, executing arbitrary JavaScript in their contexts upon form submission. This can enable unauthorized access and harmful actions, compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the complete KC instance. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6236 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 8. When an OIDC app that serves multiple tenants attempts to access the second tenant, it should prompt the user to log in again since the second tenant is secured with a different OIDC configuration. The underlying issue is in OidcSessionTokenStore when determining if a cached token should be used or not. This logic needs to be updated to take into account the new "provider-url" option in addition to the "realm" option. EAP-7 does not provide the vulnerable provider-url configuration option in its OIDC implementation and is not affected by this flaw. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10973 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Keycloak. The environment option `KC_CACHE_EMBEDDED_MTLS_ENABLED` does not work and the JGroups replication configuration is always used in plain text which can allow an attacker that has access to adjacent networks related to JGroups to read sensitive information. | ||||