Search Results (24335 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-20014 1 Myscada 1 Mypro Manager 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
mySCADA myPRO does not properly neutralize POST requests sent to a specific port with version information. This vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the affected system.
CVE-2015-10141 2026-04-15 5.6 Medium
An unauthenticated OS command injection vulnerability exists within Xdebug versions 2.5.5 and earlier, a PHP debugging extension developed by Derick Rethans. When remote debugging is enabled, Xdebug listens on port 9000 and accepts debugger protocol commands without authentication. An attacker can send a crafted eval command over this interface to execute arbitrary PHP code, which may invoke system-level functions such as system() or passthru(). This results in full compromise of the host under the privileges of the web server user.
CVE-2024-8684 2026-04-15 8.3 High
OS Command Injection vulnerability in Revolution Pi version 2022-07-28-revpi-buster from KUNBUS GmbH. This vulnerability could allow an authenticated attacker to execute OS commands on the device via the ‘php/dal.php’ endpoint, in the ‘arrSaveConfig’ parameter.
CVE-2024-7695 2026-04-15 7.5 High
Multiple switches are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability. This vulnerability is caused by insufficient input validation, which allows data to be written to memory outside the bounds of the buffer. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in a denial-of-service attack.
CVE-2025-22469 1 Sato 4 Cl4nx-j Plus, Cl4nx Plus, Cl6nx-j Plus and 1 more 2026-04-15 N/A
OS command injection vulnerability exists in CL4/6NX Plus and CL4/6NX-J Plus (Japan model) with the firmware versions prior to 1.15.5-r1. An arbitrary OS command may be executed on the system with a certain non-administrative user privilege.
CVE-2025-26403 1 Intel 2 Xeon, Xeon Processors 2026-04-15 7.2 High
Out-of-bounds write in the memory subsystem for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processors when using Intel(R) SGX or Intel(R) TDX may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2025-34055 2026-04-15 N/A
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in AVTECH DVR, NVR, and IP camera devices within the adcommand.cgi endpoint, which interfaces with the ActionD daemon. Authenticated users can invoke the DoShellCmd operation, passing arbitrary input via the strCmd parameter. This input is executed directly by the system shell without sanitation allowing attackers to execute commands as the root user.
CVE-2025-32107 2026-04-15 N/A
OS command injection vulnerability exists in Deco BE65 Pro firmware versions prior to "Deco BE65 Pro(JP)_V1_1.1.2 Build 20250123". If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by the user who can log in to the device.
CVE-2012-10028 1 Netwin 1 Surgeftp 2026-04-15 N/A
Netwin SurgeFTP version 23c8 and prior contains a vulnerability in its web-based administrative console that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary system commands via crafted POST requests to `surgeftpmgr.cgi`. This can lead to full remote code execution on the underlying system.
CVE-2012-10029 1 Nagios 4 Nagios, Nagios Xi, Xi and 1 more 2026-04-15 N/A
Nagios XI Network Monitor prior to Graph Explorer component version 1.3 contains a command injection vulnerability in `visApi.php`. An authenticated user can inject system commands via unsanitized parameters such as `host`, resulting in remote code execution.
CVE-2012-10037 2026-04-15 N/A
PhpTax version 0.8 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in drawimage.php. The pfilez GET parameter is unsafely passed to the exec() function without sanitization. A remote attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands, leading to code execution under the web server's context. No authentication is required.
CVE-2012-10039 1 Zevenet 1 Zen Load Balancer 2026-04-15 N/A
ZEN Load Balancer versions 2.0 and 3.0-rc1 contain a command injection vulnerability in content2-2.cgi. The filelog parameter is passed directly into a backtick-delimited exec() call without sanitation. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands, resulting in remote code execution as the root user. ZEN Load Balancer is the predecessor of ZEVENET and SKUDONET. The affected versions (2.0 and 3.0-rc1) are no longer supported. SKUDONET CE is the current community-maintained successor.
CVE-2012-10040 1 Openfiler 1 Openfiler 2026-04-15 N/A
Openfiler v2.x contains a command injection vulnerability in the system.html page. The device parameter is used to instantiate a NetworkCard object, whose constructor in network.inc calls exec() with unsanitized input. An authenticated attacker can exploit this to execute arbitrary commands as the openfiler user. Due to misconfigured sudoers, the openfiler user can escalate privileges to root via sudo /bin/bash without a password.
CVE-2012-10046 1 Esva Project 1 Esva 2026-04-15 N/A
The E-Mail Security Virtual Appliance (ESVA) (tested on version ESVA_2057) contains an unauthenticated command injection vulnerability in the learn-msg.cgi script. The CGI handler fails to sanitize user-supplied input passed via the id parameter, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands. Exploitation requires no authentication and results in full command execution on the underlying system.
CVE-2012-10059 1 Dolibarr 2 Dolibarr, Dolibarr Erp/crm 2026-04-15 N/A
Dolibarr ERP/CRM versions <= 3.1.1 and <= 3.2.0 contain a post-authenticated OS command injection vulnerability in its database backup feature. The export.php script fails to sanitize the sql_compat parameter, allowing authenticated users to inject arbitrary system commands, resulting in remote code execution on the server.
CVE-2013-10037 2 Eppler Software, Webtester 2 Webtester, Webtester 2026-04-15 N/A
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in WebTester version 5.x via the install2.php installation script. The parameters cpusername, cppassword, and cpdomain are passed directly to shell commands without sanitization. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit this flaw by sending a crafted HTTP POST request, resulting in arbitrary command execution on the underlying system with web server privileges.
CVE-2013-10039 1 Gestioip 1 Gestioip 2026-04-15 N/A
A command injection vulnerability exists in GestioIP 3.0 commit ac67be and earlier in ip_checkhost.cgi. Crafted input to the 'ip' parameter allows attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands on the server via embedded base64-encoded payloads. Authentication may be required depending on deployment configuration.
CVE-2024-13089 2026-04-15 7.2 High
An OS command injection vulnerability within the update functionality may allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized arbitrary OS commands. Users with administrative privileges may upload update packages to upgrade the versions of Nozomi Networks Guardian and CMC. While these updates are signed and their signatures are validated prior to installation, an improper signature validation check has been identified. This issue could potentially enable users to execute commands remotely on the appliance, thereby impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
CVE-2025-10659 1 Megasys 1 Telenium Online Web Application 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
The Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a PHP endpoint accessible to unauthenticated network users that improperly handles user-supplied input. This vulnerability occurs due to the insecure termination of a regular expression check within the endpoint. Because the input is not correctly validated or sanitized, an unauthenticated attacker can inject arbitrary operating system commands through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server in the context of the web application service account.
CVE-2025-11148 1 Check-branches Project 1 Check-branches 2026-04-15 9.8 Critical
All versions of the package check-branches are vulnerable to Command Injection check-branches is a command-line tool that is interacted with locally, or via CI, to confirm no conflicts exist in git branches. However, the library follows these conventions which can be abused: 1. It trusts branch names as they are (plain text) 2. It spawns git commands by concatenating user input Since a branch name is potentially a user input - as users can create branches remotely via pull requests, or simply due to privileged access to a repository - it can effectively be abused to run any command.